All services

Governance & Trust

Independent AI Assurance

An independent opinion your risk committee can rely on.

Independent
No build stake in the outcome
4–6 wks
Typical review cycle
Board-ready
Findings and management response

The problem we solve

Boards increasingly need assurance that is not written by the team that built the system. We review models, vendors and controls against a published methodology and report findings plainly, including the ones nobody wanted.

What the work includes

Control effectiveness testing

Sample-based testing of governance, oversight and technical controls as operated, not as documented.

Model review

Performance, bias, robustness and documentation quality assessed against intended use.

Vendor assurance

Third-party AI supplier review covering security, data use, model change management and exit.

Regulatory readiness

Gap assessment against EU AI Act, ISO 42001, sector rules and internal policy.

How the engagement runs

A sequence you can plan a quarter around.

  1. 01

    Scope

    Systems in scope, methodology and reporting lines agreed in writing.

  2. 02

    Test

    Evidence collection, control testing, interviews and model review.

  3. 03

    Report

    Draft findings, management response and committee readout.

Common questions

Before you commit.

Can you assure systems you built?
No. Where we delivered the build, we bring in an independent reviewer or step aside from the assurance role.
Does this satisfy an external audit?
It prepares you for one and often reduces its length, but it does not replace a statutory or certification audit.

Talk through independent ai assurance.

A 45-minute briefing with the people who would run the work — scope, timeline and a straight answer on whether it is the right next step.

Book a briefing